Feb 4, 2025
But Hume wasn’t rejecting the evidence. He was comparing the evidence for a miracle to the evidence that there are no miracles, choosing the conclusion supported by a preponderance of of evidence. So, no contradiction that I can see.
But Hume wasn’t rejecting the evidence. He was comparing the evidence for a miracle to the evidence that there are no miracles, choosing the conclusion supported by a preponderance of of evidence. So, no contradiction that I can see.
by Massimo Pigliucci, a scientist, philosopher, and Professor at the City College of New York. Exploring and practicing Stoicism & other philosophies of life.