Forgive me, but I fail to say what’s mundane in Wolf’s arguments and conclusions. Moral sainthood has been, and still is, presented as an ideal model around the world, cross-culturally.

I also don’t understand why philosophy is “out of the landscape of human language,” a statement made more puzzling by the fact that you quote Wittgenstein, a philosopher.

As for evolutionary psychology, there are very serious reasons to doubt that it is a fully formed and reliable science. The progress you mention doesn’t come from evolutionary psychology, but from comparative anthropology and comparative moral psychology, altogether different fields.